https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458891 The Competition Commission concluded that there was no contravention of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, as the alleged dominance of the digital payment platform in the relevant market was not established. Consequently, the case was closed under Section 26(2) of the Act, and the request for interim relief under Section 33 was denied. The Secretary was instructed to communicate this decision to the Informant. en-us Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:12:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458891 The Competition Commission concluded that there was no contravention of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, as the alleged dominance of the digital payment platform in the relevant market was not established. Consequently, the case was closed under Section 26(2) of the Act, and the request for interim relief under Section 33 was denied. The Secretary was instructed to communicate this decision to the Informant. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458891