<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1363 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458878</link>
    <description>Civil court jurisdiction is not barred under the SEBI Act unless the dispute is one that the Act or its regulations expressly entrust to SEBI authorities, the Adjudicating Officer, or SAT. A contractual claim for recovery linked to a public issue was treated as a money claim, not an underwriting dispute or any matter for which the statute provides an adjudicatory mechanism. Because no specific statutory power existed to decree recovery of such a claim, exclusion of civil jurisdiction could not be inferred, and the civil court remained available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 16:50:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1363 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458878</link>
      <description>Civil court jurisdiction is not barred under the SEBI Act unless the dispute is one that the Act or its regulations expressly entrust to SEBI authorities, the Adjudicating Officer, or SAT. A contractual claim for recovery linked to a public issue was treated as a money claim, not an underwriting dispute or any matter for which the statute provides an adjudicatory mechanism. Because no specific statutory power existed to decree recovery of such a claim, exclusion of civil jurisdiction could not be inferred, and the civil court remained available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>