https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458877 The writ petitions challenging Karnataka Ordinance No. 2 of 1991 were dismissed by the HC, affirming its validity under Article 213. The court ruled that the ordinance-making power is legislative, and the Governor's satisfaction is non-justiciable. The ordinance did not breach Article 14, as the removal process differentiation was justified. A certificate for appeal to the SC was granted due to the substantial question of law concerning Article 213's interpretation. An interim order was issued to maintain the status quo, allowing petitioners to approach the SC. en-us Mon, 11 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:44:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458877 The writ petitions challenging Karnataka Ordinance No. 2 of 1991 were dismissed by the HC, affirming its validity under Article 213. The court ruled that the ordinance-making power is legislative, and the Governor's satisfaction is non-justiciable. The ordinance did not breach Article 14, as the removal process differentiation was justified. A certificate for appeal to the SC was granted due to the substantial question of law concerning Article 213's interpretation. An interim order was issued to maintain the status quo, allowing petitioners to approach the SC. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458877