<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 878 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761892</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, affirming the findings of the CESTAT, New Delhi. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned. Both parties were represented by legal counsel, with the appellant&#039;s side led by Mr. Raghavendra P Shankar and the respondent&#039;s side led by Mr. V. Lakshmikumaran.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 08:47:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 878 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761892</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, affirming the findings of the CESTAT, New Delhi. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned. Both parties were represented by legal counsel, with the appellant&#039;s side led by Mr. Raghavendra P Shankar and the respondent&#039;s side led by Mr. V. Lakshmikumaran.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>