https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761918 Where the appellate tribunal was not functioning, the High Court applied the earlier Division Bench precedent in M/s. Maa Tarini Traders and disposed of the writ petition as covered by that order. The precedent governed the interim deposit requirement and preserved liberty to pursue the statutory remedy once the tribunal is reconstituted. The department did not dispute that the petition fell within the earlier ruling, so the court followed the existing deposit-and-liberty regime rather than independently examining the appellate order. en-us Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Nov 2024 08:47:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761918 Where the appellate tribunal was not functioning, the High Court applied the earlier Division Bench precedent in M/s. Maa Tarini Traders and disposed of the writ petition as covered by that order. The precedent governed the interim deposit requirement and preserved liberty to pursue the statutory remedy once the tribunal is reconstituted. The department did not dispute that the petition fell within the earlier ruling, so the court followed the existing deposit-and-liberty regime rather than independently examining the appellate order. Case-Laws GST Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761918