<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 906 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761920</link>
    <description>The HC addressed a jurisdictional challenge to a show cause notice under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017, concerning alleged non-payment of tax for inter-branch supplies without consideration. The petitioner cited a CBIC Circular clarifying input tax credit issues, arguing the notice lacked justification. The Court allowed the petitioner more time to respond and directed the respondent to file an affidavit-in-opposition. It granted limited interim protection, requiring any decision on the notice to await the Court&#039;s approval. The matter was set for further proceedings post-affidavit exchange, with all parties instructed to act per the server copy of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 08:47:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 906 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761920</link>
      <description>The HC addressed a jurisdictional challenge to a show cause notice under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017, concerning alleged non-payment of tax for inter-branch supplies without consideration. The petitioner cited a CBIC Circular clarifying input tax credit issues, arguing the notice lacked justification. The Court allowed the petitioner more time to respond and directed the respondent to file an affidavit-in-opposition. It granted limited interim protection, requiring any decision on the notice to await the Court&#039;s approval. The matter was set for further proceedings post-affidavit exchange, with all parties instructed to act per the server copy of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>