<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 910 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761924</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the show-cause notice and adjudication order due to inordinate and unexplained delays, which violated natural justice principles, causing prejudice to the Petitioner. The Respondents admitted the Petitioner was not responsible for the delays. The Court restrained further proceedings and emphasized timely adjudication to uphold natural justice, making the Rule absolute without cost implications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2024 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 910 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761924</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the show-cause notice and adjudication order due to inordinate and unexplained delays, which violated natural justice principles, causing prejudice to the Petitioner. The Respondents admitted the Petitioner was not responsible for the delays. The Court restrained further proceedings and emphasized timely adjudication to uphold natural justice, making the Rule absolute without cost implications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>