<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 911 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761925</link>
    <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging tax orders issued beyond statutory time limits under U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017. The court found the impugned orders dated 05.10.2024 and 02.12.2023 jurisdictionally invalid, as they exceeded the three-year period prescribed in Section 73(10). The court quashed the orders and directed de-freezing of petitioner&#039;s bank accounts, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory time limits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 911 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761925</link>
      <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging tax orders issued beyond statutory time limits under U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017. The court found the impugned orders dated 05.10.2024 and 02.12.2023 jurisdictionally invalid, as they exceeded the three-year period prescribed in Section 73(10). The court quashed the orders and directed de-freezing of petitioner&#039;s bank accounts, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory time limits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>