<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1903 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458861</link>
    <description>Land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 were treated as having lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act because the award had been made more than five years before commencement of the new Act and neither physical possession was taken nor compensation paid in accordance with law. The record showed that compensation was not paid to the landowners or deposited in court as required by Section 31 of the 1894 Act, and deposit in the Government Treasury or Revenue Department was held insufficient. On that interpretation, the acquisition was deemed to have lapsed and relief followed for the landowners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:59:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1903 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458861</link>
      <description>Land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 were treated as having lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act because the award had been made more than five years before commencement of the new Act and neither physical possession was taken nor compensation paid in accordance with law. The record showed that compensation was not paid to the landowners or deposited in court as required by Section 31 of the 1894 Act, and deposit in the Government Treasury or Revenue Department was held insufficient. On that interpretation, the acquisition was deemed to have lapsed and relief followed for the landowners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>