<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1903 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458861</link>
    <description>The MP HC disposed of appeals challenging land acquisition notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Following SC precedents in Pune Municipal Corporation and Sharma Agro Industries cases, the court held that acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid to landowners or deposited in appropriate court within five years before the new Act&#039;s enforcement, and physical possession is not taken. Despite awards passed in 1992 and 2004, the Indore Development Authority failed to pay compensation to beneficiaries or take possession. The court ruled entire proceedings had lapsed under Section 24 interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:59:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1903 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458861</link>
      <description>The MP HC disposed of appeals challenging land acquisition notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Following SC precedents in Pune Municipal Corporation and Sharma Agro Industries cases, the court held that acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid to landowners or deposited in appropriate court within five years before the new Act&#039;s enforcement, and physical possession is not taken. Despite awards passed in 1992 and 2004, the Indore Development Authority failed to pay compensation to beneficiaries or take possession. The court ruled entire proceedings had lapsed under Section 24 interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>