https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458866 Substitution was permitted because the respondent had no objection and the proposed substitute had already become the Resolution Professional. The pending appeals were then decided in line with the earlier controlling Supreme Court precedent after the review petitions against that decision were dismissed, and the impugned NCLAT order was set aside. Consequential relief followed from the governing precedent, and 90 days were granted to the substituted Resolution Professional to complete the process. en-us Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:24:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458866 Substitution was permitted because the respondent had no objection and the proposed substitute had already become the Resolution Professional. The pending appeals were then decided in line with the earlier controlling Supreme Court precedent after the review petitions against that decision were dismissed, and the impugned NCLAT order was set aside. Consequential relief followed from the governing precedent, and 90 days were granted to the substituted Resolution Professional to complete the process. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458866