<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1922 (3) TMI 7 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458860</link>
    <description>The Subordinate Judge lacked authority to decide the case on its merits in the absence of the appellant and his pleader. The court set aside the previous order, directing the Subordinate Judge to restore the appeal to the file and dispose of it per legal procedures, underscoring the necessity of proper representation in appellate proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 1922 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:29:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1922 (3) TMI 7 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458860</link>
      <description>The Subordinate Judge lacked authority to decide the case on its merits in the absence of the appellant and his pleader. The court set aside the previous order, directing the Subordinate Judge to restore the appeal to the file and dispose of it per legal procedures, underscoring the necessity of proper representation in appellate proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 1922 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>