<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1587 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458859</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter for reevaluation of the product &quot;Vipul Booster&quot; under the insecticides category, setting aside the impugned order. The Assistant Commissioner was directed to reassess the classification, as the original adjudicating authority did not consider the insecticide classification. The stay petitions and appeals were disposed of, without expressing an opinion on the classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:53:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1587 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458859</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter for reevaluation of the product &quot;Vipul Booster&quot; under the insecticides category, setting aside the impugned order. The Assistant Commissioner was directed to reassess the classification, as the original adjudicating authority did not consider the insecticide classification. The stay petitions and appeals were disposed of, without expressing an opinion on the classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>