<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (4) TMI 21 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39285</link>
    <description>The High Court held that Messrs. Venkata Narasimha Rao &amp;amp; Co. and Messrs. Raja Fertilisers should be treated as one firm for tax assessment purposes. The court emphasized that firms have no legal existence apart from their partners and that identical partners in two firms essentially constitute one firm in law. The decision favored the revenue, with no costs awarded and an advocate&#039;s fee set at Rs. 250.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:22:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (4) TMI 21 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39285</link>
      <description>The High Court held that Messrs. Venkata Narasimha Rao &amp;amp; Co. and Messrs. Raja Fertilisers should be treated as one firm for tax assessment purposes. The court emphasized that firms have no legal existence apart from their partners and that identical partners in two firms essentially constitute one firm in law. The decision favored the revenue, with no costs awarded and an advocate&#039;s fee set at Rs. 250.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>