<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 839 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761853</link>
    <description>An order impleading a company as an additional corporate debtor in a pending insolvency application was found prima facie unsustainable because the compliance required under Section 9(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 had not been made. Interim protection was granted by staying the impleadment order. The underlying application against the original corporate debtor was permitted to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:40:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 839 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761853</link>
      <description>An order impleading a company as an additional corporate debtor in a pending insolvency application was found prima facie unsustainable because the compliance required under Section 9(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 had not been made. Interim protection was granted by staying the impleadment order. The underlying application against the original corporate debtor was permitted to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>