<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 854 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761868</link>
    <description>ITAT Jaipur held that addition under section 68 for unexplained cash credit was not sustainable. The assessee was scrutinized for cash deposits during demonetization period. The tribunal found that while the AO accepted part of the sales based on evidence, the same evidence was rejected for other sales without proper justification. The addition was based merely on presumption and assumption without establishing the assessee&#039;s failure to prove the transactions. The tribunal directed deletion of the addition and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:40:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 854 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761868</link>
      <description>ITAT Jaipur held that addition under section 68 for unexplained cash credit was not sustainable. The assessee was scrutinized for cash deposits during demonetization period. The tribunal found that while the AO accepted part of the sales based on evidence, the same evidence was rejected for other sales without proper justification. The addition was based merely on presumption and assumption without establishing the assessee&#039;s failure to prove the transactions. The tribunal directed deletion of the addition and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>