<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1765 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458839</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC dismissed jurisdictional objections and granted interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, appointing a Court Receiver for mortgaged property. Despite parties agreeing to arbitration with Mumbai jurisdiction, the court held it could grant interim measures even for properties not directly subject to arbitration disputes. The respondents defaulted on loan repayment of Rs. 23,65,07,643/- with 12.5% annual interest. The court found petitioner had good prospects in pending arbitral proceedings and required security for substantial claims, justifying receiver appointment under Section 9(ii)(d) and (e).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:07:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1765 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458839</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC dismissed jurisdictional objections and granted interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, appointing a Court Receiver for mortgaged property. Despite parties agreeing to arbitration with Mumbai jurisdiction, the court held it could grant interim measures even for properties not directly subject to arbitration disputes. The respondents defaulted on loan repayment of Rs. 23,65,07,643/- with 12.5% annual interest. The court found petitioner had good prospects in pending arbitral proceedings and required security for substantial claims, justifying receiver appointment under Section 9(ii)(d) and (e).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>