https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458836 The core issue was whether applications under the Company (Court) Rules to consign long pending company proceedings to record may be allowed when respondents are untraceable and service cannot be effected, while preserving scope to revive later as the company is not finally dissolved under the Companies Act. The court applied the principle that consignment to record is appropriate where prolonged inability to serve obstructs progress and substantive relief cannot be obtained, and accordingly allowed the Official Liquidator's s.9 application, consigning the specified matters to record with liberty to revive when respondents are located. en-us Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:27:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458836 The core issue was whether applications under the Company (Court) Rules to consign long pending company proceedings to record may be allowed when respondents are untraceable and service cannot be effected, while preserving scope to revive later as the company is not finally dissolved under the Companies Act. The court applied the principle that consignment to record is appropriate where prolonged inability to serve obstructs progress and substantive relief cannot be obtained, and accordingly allowed the Official Liquidator's s.9 application, consigning the specified matters to record with liberty to revive when respondents are located. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458836