<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 936 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458837</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, affirming eligibility for deduction under Section 80-IB(10) while rejecting the Commissioner&#039;s reallocation of indirect administrative expenses. It directed reassessment of interest expenditure allocation based on actual loan utilization and upheld the allocation of depreciation on general assets. The Assessing Officer was instructed to further examine these issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:27:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 936 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458837</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, affirming eligibility for deduction under Section 80-IB(10) while rejecting the Commissioner&#039;s reallocation of indirect administrative expenses. It directed reassessment of interest expenditure allocation based on actual loan utilization and upheld the allocation of depreciation on general assets. The Assessing Officer was instructed to further examine these issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>