<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 1144 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458830</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the sale in favor of respondent No. 1, dismissing the appeals by the appellant and the workers union. The court emphasized the principles governing the review of confirmed sales, asserting its inherent power to reopen sales to ensure the best price for the company in liquidation. The judgment concluded with no order as to costs, affirming the learned Single Judge&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:58:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 1144 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458830</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the sale in favor of respondent No. 1, dismissing the appeals by the appellant and the workers union. The court emphasized the principles governing the review of confirmed sales, asserting its inherent power to reopen sales to ensure the best price for the company in liquidation. The judgment concluded with no order as to costs, affirming the learned Single Judge&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>