https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458834 The court decreed that the plaintiff was entitled to a refund of Rs. 2,08,985.43 with interest at 12% from November 22, 1972, until realization, along with proportionate costs. The defendant could adjust interest and litigation expenses incurred from the total amount initially paid by the plaintiff. The plaintiff's claims were within the limitation period, supported by the defendant's acknowledgment of liability. The defendant, acting under legal compulsion, was entitled to reimbursement for interest and litigation expenses per relevant sections of the Contract Act. The court found the plaintiff's payment to the defendant was made in trust, entitling them to a refund post-SC judgment. en-us Wed, 29 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:58:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458834 The court decreed that the plaintiff was entitled to a refund of Rs. 2,08,985.43 with interest at 12% from November 22, 1972, until realization, along with proportionate costs. The defendant could adjust interest and litigation expenses incurred from the total amount initially paid by the plaintiff. The plaintiff's claims were within the limitation period, supported by the defendant's acknowledgment of liability. The defendant, acting under legal compulsion, was entitled to reimbursement for interest and litigation expenses per relevant sections of the Contract Act. The court found the plaintiff's payment to the defendant was made in trust, entitling them to a refund post-SC judgment. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Wed, 29 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458834