<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1258 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458822</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the petitioners&#039; claim to halt proceedings under the SARFAESI Act and RDBFI Act, as the company was not in liquidation. The court held that workmen&#039;s priority in asset distribution under section 529A of the Companies Act is only applicable during winding-up. The petitioners&#039; request to quash DRT proceedings and demand immediate payment of dues was denied. The court clarified that petitioners could seek relief if future winding-up proceedings occur, without affecting their right to claim surplus amounts from ongoing proceedings. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal procedures and limitations on workmen&#039;s claims without liquidation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 12:57:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1258 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458822</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the petitioners&#039; claim to halt proceedings under the SARFAESI Act and RDBFI Act, as the company was not in liquidation. The court held that workmen&#039;s priority in asset distribution under section 529A of the Companies Act is only applicable during winding-up. The petitioners&#039; request to quash DRT proceedings and demand immediate payment of dues was denied. The court clarified that petitioners could seek relief if future winding-up proceedings occur, without affecting their right to claim surplus amounts from ongoing proceedings. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal procedures and limitations on workmen&#039;s claims without liquidation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>