<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (5) TMI 201 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458821</link>
    <description>The SC determined that the detention orders under PASA were procedurally flawed and violated constitutional rights due to delayed consideration of representations under Art. 22(5). Consequently, the SC declared the detention orders illegal and ordered the release of the detenues, except for the absconding individual.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:57:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (5) TMI 201 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458821</link>
      <description>The SC determined that the detention orders under PASA were procedurally flawed and violated constitutional rights due to delayed consideration of representations under Art. 22(5). Consequently, the SC declared the detention orders illegal and ordered the release of the detenues, except for the absconding individual.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>