<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 822 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458819</link>
    <description>Credible eyewitness testimony, when corroborated by medical evidence and other objective material, was sufficient to sustain the conviction despite claims that some witnesses were partisan. The acquittal of some co-accused did not weaken the case against the appellants because the evidence against them was separately supported and the co-accused were assessed on a different evidentiary basis. Forwarding of the first information report to the Magistrate within about six hours was treated as reasonable in the circumstances and not fatal to the prosecution. The absence of blood on recovered weapons also did not create an adverse inference where the weapons had been recovered from flowing water.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:47:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 822 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458819</link>
      <description>Credible eyewitness testimony, when corroborated by medical evidence and other objective material, was sufficient to sustain the conviction despite claims that some witnesses were partisan. The acquittal of some co-accused did not weaken the case against the appellants because the evidence against them was separately supported and the co-accused were assessed on a different evidentiary basis. Forwarding of the first information report to the Magistrate within about six hours was treated as reasonable in the circumstances and not fatal to the prosecution. The absence of blood on recovered weapons also did not create an adverse inference where the weapons had been recovered from flowing water.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>