<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (10) TMI 21 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39273</link>
    <description>A release deed could not create a valid partial partition of a Hindu undivided family business between a mother and her minor son where no partition between coparceners had legally occurred. The Explanation to Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 creates only a notional partition to determine the deceased coparcener&#039;s share for succession; it does not effect an actual division among surviving members. A mother or wife has no independent right to insist on partition by metes and bounds in the absence of a coparcenary partition. On these facts, the deed did not bring about a legally effective partition, and the issue was answered against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:41:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (10) TMI 21 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39273</link>
      <description>A release deed could not create a valid partial partition of a Hindu undivided family business between a mother and her minor son where no partition between coparceners had legally occurred. The Explanation to Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 creates only a notional partition to determine the deceased coparcener&#039;s share for succession; it does not effect an actual division among surviving members. A mother or wife has no independent right to insist on partition by metes and bounds in the absence of a coparcenary partition. On these facts, the deed did not bring about a legally effective partition, and the issue was answered against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>