<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 801 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761815</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging admission of Section 7 application filed by financial creditor. Tribunal held financial debt was established through ledger entries showing interest payments and TDS, confirmed by corporate debtor&#039;s letter dated 20.08.2020 admitting loan. Application filed on 20.01.2023 was not time-barred as corporate debtor&#039;s written promise to repay on 20.08.2020 triggered fresh limitation period under Section 25(3) of Indian Contract Act. Section 10A did not bar application since default occurred before Section 10A period commenced. Corporate debtor&#039;s promise to allot residential premises developed by director could not extinguish financial debt owed by company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 17:34:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 801 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761815</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging admission of Section 7 application filed by financial creditor. Tribunal held financial debt was established through ledger entries showing interest payments and TDS, confirmed by corporate debtor&#039;s letter dated 20.08.2020 admitting loan. Application filed on 20.01.2023 was not time-barred as corporate debtor&#039;s written promise to repay on 20.08.2020 triggered fresh limitation period under Section 25(3) of Indian Contract Act. Section 10A did not bar application since default occurred before Section 10A period commenced. Corporate debtor&#039;s promise to allot residential premises developed by director could not extinguish financial debt owed by company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>