<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 818 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761832</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled on multiple issues involving computation of deductions under sections 80IB/80IC and 10B. The tribunal directed the AO to allocate both common expenses and common income to eligible units while computing deductions, following previous ITAT orders. Income from sale of scraps and by-products was held eligible for deduction as it reduces manufacturing costs. The tribunal rejected claims for Tsunami relief expenses as business expenditure, finding the dominant objective philanthropic rather than business-related. On WDV enhancement, the tribunal modified the CIT(A)&#039;s order regarding insurance claims. Capital subsidy amounts were held not deductible from WDV for depreciation computation. The tribunal upheld entity-level benchmarking under TNM method for transfer pricing adjustments, following coordinate bench precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 11:43:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 818 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761832</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled on multiple issues involving computation of deductions under sections 80IB/80IC and 10B. The tribunal directed the AO to allocate both common expenses and common income to eligible units while computing deductions, following previous ITAT orders. Income from sale of scraps and by-products was held eligible for deduction as it reduces manufacturing costs. The tribunal rejected claims for Tsunami relief expenses as business expenditure, finding the dominant objective philanthropic rather than business-related. On WDV enhancement, the tribunal modified the CIT(A)&#039;s order regarding insurance claims. Capital subsidy amounts were held not deductible from WDV for depreciation computation. The tribunal upheld entity-level benchmarking under TNM method for transfer pricing adjustments, following coordinate bench precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>