<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 819 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761833</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, ruling that the assessment for AY 2009-10 under section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was beyond jurisdiction. The Tribunal found that the notice was issued after the satisfaction was recorded for AY 2016-17, making it jurisdictionally invalid for AY 2009-10. The decision was guided by judicial precedents, including the Delhi HC&#039;s clarification on the necessity of recording satisfaction under section 153C, leading to the assessment being set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 819 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761833</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, ruling that the assessment for AY 2009-10 under section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was beyond jurisdiction. The Tribunal found that the notice was issued after the satisfaction was recorded for AY 2016-17, making it jurisdictionally invalid for AY 2009-10. The decision was guided by judicial precedents, including the Delhi HC&#039;s clarification on the necessity of recording satisfaction under section 153C, leading to the assessment being set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>