<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 1094 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458804</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the Single Judge&#039;s order, allowed the Writ Petition, and quashed the impugned proceedings. It directed the Official Liquidator to issue a fresh tender notification with a base price of Rs. 7,500 per square meter, ensuring transparency. The court ordered the return of amounts received as EMD and deposit, emphasizing the need for public authorities to act as trustees of public property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:17:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 1094 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458804</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the Single Judge&#039;s order, allowed the Writ Petition, and quashed the impugned proceedings. It directed the Official Liquidator to issue a fresh tender notification with a base price of Rs. 7,500 per square meter, ensuring transparency. The court ordered the return of amounts received as EMD and deposit, emphasizing the need for public authorities to act as trustees of public property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>