<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 1069 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458805</link>
    <description>The SC set aside SAT&#039;s order and remitted the case for de novo consideration on merits. The appellant&#039;s appeal against SEBI&#039;s suspension was initially dismissed by SAT, citing the punishment was already served. However, the SC recognized the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the stigma from SEBI&#039;s order, necessitating a merits-based decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:17:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 1069 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458805</link>
      <description>The SC set aside SAT&#039;s order and remitted the case for de novo consideration on merits. The appellant&#039;s appeal against SEBI&#039;s suspension was initially dismissed by SAT, citing the punishment was already served. However, the SC recognized the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the stigma from SEBI&#039;s order, necessitating a merits-based decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>