<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 1027 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458807</link>
    <description>The HC ordered the revival of the company, contingent upon the payment of specified amounts to creditors and the official liquidator. The cancellation of industrial sheds allotment was set aside, allowing future actions by HSSIEC per allotment terms. The judgment underscored adherence to legal procedures post-winding up and ensured equitable creditor treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:17:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 1027 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458807</link>
      <description>The HC ordered the revival of the company, contingent upon the payment of specified amounts to creditors and the official liquidator. The cancellation of industrial sheds allotment was set aside, allowing future actions by HSSIEC per allotment terms. The judgment underscored adherence to legal procedures post-winding up and ensured equitable creditor treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>