<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 2123 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458810</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court noted that the matter had earlier been adjourned to await the decision in Indore Development Authority v. Shailendra, which had since been decided. In view of the nature of the issues involved, the Court stated that the issues should be resolved by a larger Bench at the earliest. The matters were directed to be placed before the appropriate Bench the next day, in accordance with the Chief Justice of India&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:17:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 2123 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458810</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court noted that the matter had earlier been adjourned to await the decision in Indore Development Authority v. Shailendra, which had since been decided. In view of the nature of the issues involved, the Court stated that the issues should be resolved by a larger Bench at the earliest. The matters were directed to be placed before the appropriate Bench the next day, in accordance with the Chief Justice of India&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>