<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (1) TMI 32 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39259</link>
    <description>Bonus was treated as part of &quot;salary&quot; for disallowance under section 40(c)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, because Explanation 2 adopted the rule 2(h) definition from the Fourth Schedule and that definition did not expressly exclude bonus. The analysis also noted that labour law and the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 recognise bonus as wages or additional wages rather than a purely voluntary payment. On that basis, the provision was read to include bonus within salary, and the issue was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:50:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (1) TMI 32 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39259</link>
      <description>Bonus was treated as part of &quot;salary&quot; for disallowance under section 40(c)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, because Explanation 2 adopted the rule 2(h) definition from the Fourth Schedule and that definition did not expressly exclude bonus. The analysis also noted that labour law and the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 recognise bonus as wages or additional wages rather than a purely voluntary payment. On that basis, the provision was read to include bonus within salary, and the issue was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>