https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761793 An order rejecting a GST-related claim was unsustainable because it considered only one aspect of the petitioner's reply and failed to address the specific plea that declarations required under Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST had been produced, as well as the contention that amounts covering the balance demand had been remitted. Since all material contentions were not examined, the order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after hearing the petitioner and considering the entire reply on merits. en-us Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jun 2025 14:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761793 An order rejecting a GST-related claim was unsustainable because it considered only one aspect of the petitioner's reply and failed to address the specific plea that declarations required under Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST had been produced, as well as the contention that amounts covering the balance demand had been remitted. Since all material contentions were not examined, the order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after hearing the petitioner and considering the entire reply on merits. Case-Laws GST Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761793