<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (5) TMI 11 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39251</link>
    <description>The High Court determined that the managing director&#039;s remuneration received by Hari Krishna was his individual income and not taxable in the hands of the Hindu undivided family. The court found that the remuneration was a return for services rendered by Hari Krishna and not a return on family funds&#039; investment. The decision was based on established legal principles and factual circumstances, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee and awarding costs accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:55:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (5) TMI 11 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39251</link>
      <description>The High Court determined that the managing director&#039;s remuneration received by Hari Krishna was his individual income and not taxable in the hands of the Hindu undivided family. The court found that the remuneration was a return for services rendered by Hari Krishna and not a return on family funds&#039; investment. The decision was based on established legal principles and factual circumstances, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee and awarding costs accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>