https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458774 The HC granted the condonation of a 546-day delay in filing the appeal against an ex parte decree, emphasizing substantial justice over procedural technicalities. The Court acknowledged procedural lapses by the appellant's advocate and allowed the appeal to proceed, highlighting that litigants should not suffer due to their advocate's inaction. The jurisdictional challenge under the SEBI Act was noted but not definitively ruled upon, as the primary focus was on excusing the delay. The decision underscored the importance of addressing substantive justice, allowing the appeal to continue without staying the order. en-us Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Nov 2024 18:59:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458774 The HC granted the condonation of a 546-day delay in filing the appeal against an ex parte decree, emphasizing substantial justice over procedural technicalities. The Court acknowledged procedural lapses by the appellant's advocate and allowed the appeal to proceed, highlighting that litigants should not suffer due to their advocate's inaction. The jurisdictional challenge under the SEBI Act was noted but not definitively ruled upon, as the primary focus was on excusing the delay. The decision underscored the importance of addressing substantive justice, allowing the appeal to continue without staying the order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458774