<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1444 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458778</link>
    <description>After completion of investigation in alleged economic offences, regular bail may be granted where custodial necessity no longer survives and the triple test is satisfied. The court treated the second bail application as maintainable because the later supplementary charge-sheet and clarification on the disputed transaction constituted a change in circumstance. It found the material to be largely documentary, noted substantial custody, and saw no material of misuse of interim bail, tampering with evidence, or witness influence. Gravity of the allegations alone was held insufficient to deny bail, and continued incarceration was found unwarranted. Bail was granted subject to conditions securing the applicant&#039;s presence and protecting the trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 18:59:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1444 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458778</link>
      <description>After completion of investigation in alleged economic offences, regular bail may be granted where custodial necessity no longer survives and the triple test is satisfied. The court treated the second bail application as maintainable because the later supplementary charge-sheet and clarification on the disputed transaction constituted a change in circumstance. It found the material to be largely documentary, noted substantial custody, and saw no material of misuse of interim bail, tampering with evidence, or witness influence. Gravity of the allegations alone was held insufficient to deny bail, and continued incarceration was found unwarranted. Bail was granted subject to conditions securing the applicant&#039;s presence and protecting the trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>