https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458783 Pending consideration of whether a larger-Bench reference was required on the interpretation of Section 24 of the 2013 land acquisition law, the SC issued an interim request that High Courts should not deal with similar cases until the reference question was finally decided. The Court noted that comparable matters were already being decided or were likely to arise before different High Courts, and that maintaining the interim position would reduce the risk of inconsistent handling across courts. It also directed that similar matters pending before it be deferred to avoid inconvenience to the parties. en-us Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Sep 2025 10:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458783 Pending consideration of whether a larger-Bench reference was required on the interpretation of Section 24 of the 2013 land acquisition law, the SC issued an interim request that High Courts should not deal with similar cases until the reference question was finally decided. The Court noted that comparable matters were already being decided or were likely to arise before different High Courts, and that maintaining the interim position would reduce the risk of inconsistent handling across courts. It also directed that similar matters pending before it be deferred to avoid inconvenience to the parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458783