https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458784 Land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act were treated as having lapsed where the award was more than five years old at the commencement of the 2013 Act and physical possession had not been taken; the text says Section 24(2) then operates to deem lapse. It also states that a Section 6 declaration was defective because the State did not accept the Collector's Section 5A report or record reasons for disagreement, even though Section 5A compliance is a mandatory safeguard. On that basis, the acquisition notification and award were set aside. en-us Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Nov 2024 18:59:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458784 Land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act were treated as having lapsed where the award was more than five years old at the commencement of the 2013 Act and physical possession had not been taken; the text says Section 24(2) then operates to deem lapse. It also states that a Section 6 declaration was defective because the State did not accept the Collector's Section 5A report or record reasons for disagreement, even though Section 5A compliance is a mandatory safeguard. On that basis, the acquisition notification and award were set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458784