https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458770 In a Bombay HC note on foreign arbitral awards, a Section 34 challenge to London awards was treated as maintainable in India where Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was not expressly or clearly impliedly excluded and the dispute had a substantial Indian nexus. The court also noted that the partial awards and final award were interlinked for limitation purposes, so the delay in filing, including the challenge to earlier partial awards, was condoned on sufficient cause and within the outer limit contemplated by the Act. The matter was therefore allowed to proceed to consideration at the admission stage. en-us Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Nov 2024 15:41:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458770 In a Bombay HC note on foreign arbitral awards, a Section 34 challenge to London awards was treated as maintainable in India where Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was not expressly or clearly impliedly excluded and the dispute had a substantial Indian nexus. The court also noted that the partial awards and final award were interlinked for limitation purposes, so the delay in filing, including the challenge to earlier partial awards, was condoned on sufficient cause and within the outer limit contemplated by the Act. The matter was therefore allowed to proceed to consideration at the admission stage. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458770