<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 704 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458767</link>
    <description>A special statutory right of appeal under the Companies Act is not displaced by a general bar on further appeals in the Code of Civil Procedure unless the later provision clearly and specifically overrides that remedy. The text explains that section 483 was treated as preserving an appeal in winding up jurisdiction, including matters arising from proceedings under sections 397, 398 and 10F, while section 100A did not expressly curtail that special appellate route. Section 4(1) was also read as preserving special enactments from general procedural restrictions. The appeal was therefore maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 14:46:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 704 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458767</link>
      <description>A special statutory right of appeal under the Companies Act is not displaced by a general bar on further appeals in the Code of Civil Procedure unless the later provision clearly and specifically overrides that remedy. The text explains that section 483 was treated as preserving an appeal in winding up jurisdiction, including matters arising from proceedings under sections 397, 398 and 10F, while section 100A did not expressly curtail that special appellate route. Section 4(1) was also read as preserving special enactments from general procedural restrictions. The appeal was therefore maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>