<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1336 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458766</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings due to the invalidity of the notice issued u/s 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It upheld the genuineness of the gift received, as the AO failed to disprove the gift deed. However, the Tribunal maintained the mandatory charging of interest under sections 234B, 234C, 244A(3), and 234D, as it was deemed consequential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 13:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1336 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458766</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings due to the invalidity of the notice issued u/s 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It upheld the genuineness of the gift received, as the AO failed to disprove the gift deed. However, the Tribunal maintained the mandatory charging of interest under sections 234B, 234C, 244A(3), and 234D, as it was deemed consequential.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>