<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Corporate Debtor&#039;s Insolvency Process Initiated Due to Unpaid Debt and Lack of Dispute, Appeal Dismissed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83117</link>
    <description>The Corporate Debtor admitted outstanding operational debt owed to the Operational Creditor, citing adverse cash flow as the reason for non-payment, without attributing any dispute. The admitted debt exceeded the prescribed threshold limit. The Corporate Debtor&#039;s contentions regarding partial admission of debt and existence of pre-existing disputes were found unsubstantiated. The Adjudicating Authority rightly initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) u/s 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), as all requisite conditions were fulfilled - the operational debt was due and payable, exceeded the threshold, and no real pre-existing dispute existed. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order admitting the Section 9 application and initiating CIRP against the Corporate Debtor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:45:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:45:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Corporate Debtor&#039;s Insolvency Process Initiated Due to Unpaid Debt and Lack of Dispute, Appeal Dismissed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83117</link>
      <description>The Corporate Debtor admitted outstanding operational debt owed to the Operational Creditor, citing adverse cash flow as the reason for non-payment, without attributing any dispute. The admitted debt exceeded the prescribed threshold limit. The Corporate Debtor&#039;s contentions regarding partial admission of debt and existence of pre-existing disputes were found unsubstantiated. The Adjudicating Authority rightly initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) u/s 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), as all requisite conditions were fulfilled - the operational debt was due and payable, exceeded the threshold, and no real pre-existing dispute existed. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order admitting the Section 9 application and initiating CIRP against the Corporate Debtor.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:45:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>