<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 674 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761688</link>
    <description>A dispute over the quantified balance payable to an operational creditor depended on scrutiny of evidence, documents and the effect of the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council order. The appellate forum found that the exact amount remained unresolved and that the earlier order had already preserved liberty to seek redress before the adjudicating authority. As the controversy turned on factual calculation and determination of the balance claim, the matter was left for fresh examination by the adjudicating authority in accordance with that liberty. The appeal was therefore not entertained on merits and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:45:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 674 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761688</link>
      <description>A dispute over the quantified balance payable to an operational creditor depended on scrutiny of evidence, documents and the effect of the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council order. The appellate forum found that the exact amount remained unresolved and that the earlier order had already preserved liberty to seek redress before the adjudicating authority. As the controversy turned on factual calculation and determination of the balance claim, the matter was left for fresh examination by the adjudicating authority in accordance with that liberty. The appeal was therefore not entertained on merits and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>