<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 695 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761709</link>
    <description>HC held that notices issued under s.148 to reopen assessments against companies that ceased to exist post-amalgamation were without jurisdiction. Because assessments for the year had already been passed in the name of the appropriate assessees and the Department was aware of the amalgamations, the reopening notices were untenable. The petitions were allowed and the impugned s.148 notices were quashed and set aside, decision recorded in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 18:21:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 695 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761709</link>
      <description>HC held that notices issued under s.148 to reopen assessments against companies that ceased to exist post-amalgamation were without jurisdiction. Because assessments for the year had already been passed in the name of the appropriate assessees and the Department was aware of the amalgamations, the reopening notices were untenable. The petitions were allowed and the impugned s.148 notices were quashed and set aside, decision recorded in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>