<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1370 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458761</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(Exemption)&#039;s rejection of the appellant&#039;s application for approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, citing procedural errors. The Tribunal, influenced by a Calcutta Bench judgment, emphasized procedural fairness and remitted the matter for reconsideration, directing the CIT to assess the application under the correct proviso clause. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, favoring the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:45:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1370 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458761</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(Exemption)&#039;s rejection of the appellant&#039;s application for approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, citing procedural errors. The Tribunal, influenced by a Calcutta Bench judgment, emphasized procedural fairness and remitted the matter for reconsideration, directing the CIT to assess the application under the correct proviso clause. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, favoring the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>