https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458742 Section 24(2) of the 2013 land acquisition law raised unresolved questions concerning the meaning of unpaid compensation, the effect of deposit with the Land Acquisition Collector under the 1894 law, non-deposit in the Reference Court, disputed possession, and landowners' refusal to accept compensation. Earlier decisions had not addressed all of these issues. The substantive question whether acquisition proceedings lapse where an old award exists and compensation was deposited with the Collector therefore remained unresolved, with the matter to be placed before a larger Bench for consideration. en-us Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Nov 2024 12:33:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458742 Section 24(2) of the 2013 land acquisition law raised unresolved questions concerning the meaning of unpaid compensation, the effect of deposit with the Land Acquisition Collector under the 1894 law, non-deposit in the Reference Court, disputed possession, and landowners' refusal to accept compensation. Earlier decisions had not addressed all of these issues. The substantive question whether acquisition proceedings lapse where an old award exists and compensation was deposited with the Collector therefore remained unresolved, with the matter to be placed before a larger Bench for consideration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458742