<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1492 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458744</link>
    <description>Delhi HC held that winding-up petition must be transferred to NCLT upon application, following SC precedent in Forech India Ltd. v. Edelweiss Assets Reconstruction Co. Ltd. Under Section 434 of Companies Act 2013, NCLT must treat transferred petition as initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under IBC 2016, not proceed directly to liquidation. NCLT bound to explore resolution first through CIRP process. Application disposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 19:06:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1492 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458744</link>
      <description>Delhi HC held that winding-up petition must be transferred to NCLT upon application, following SC precedent in Forech India Ltd. v. Edelweiss Assets Reconstruction Co. Ltd. Under Section 434 of Companies Act 2013, NCLT must treat transferred petition as initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under IBC 2016, not proceed directly to liquidation. NCLT bound to explore resolution first through CIRP process. Application disposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>