<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 614 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761628</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chandigarh allowed the appeal of a commercial coaching center providing computer training, technology-based training, and medical transcription services. The tribunal held that appellant&#039;s vocational courses fell within the exemption under Notifications 09/2003-ST and 24/04-ST, as they provided skills enabling trainees to seek employment or self-employment directly after training. The service tax demand was set aside. Regarding Cenvat credit, the tribunal found appellant correctly utilized Rs. 81,476 credit while maintaining separate accounts for input and output services, with no wrong utilization during the relevant period, making Rule 6 restrictions inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 614 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761628</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chandigarh allowed the appeal of a commercial coaching center providing computer training, technology-based training, and medical transcription services. The tribunal held that appellant&#039;s vocational courses fell within the exemption under Notifications 09/2003-ST and 24/04-ST, as they provided skills enabling trainees to seek employment or self-employment directly after training. The service tax demand was set aside. Regarding Cenvat credit, the tribunal found appellant correctly utilized Rs. 81,476 credit while maintaining separate accounts for input and output services, with no wrong utilization during the relevant period, making Rule 6 restrictions inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>