<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 627 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761641</link>
    <description>ITAT Jaipur quashed section 147 reopening proceedings initiated by AO based on Sub Registrar information regarding unexplained property investment. The CIT&#039;s approval was deemed improper as it lacked independent satisfaction and verification. The tribunal found procedural irregularities where AO made additions without invoking specific legal provisions or informing the assessee under which section liability arose. CIT(A)&#039;s order was also dismissed for wrongly applying Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme provisions. The tribunal held that without specifying applicable legal provisions, additions cannot be sustained as it violates natural justice principles. The appeal was allowed and all additions deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 627 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761641</link>
      <description>ITAT Jaipur quashed section 147 reopening proceedings initiated by AO based on Sub Registrar information regarding unexplained property investment. The CIT&#039;s approval was deemed improper as it lacked independent satisfaction and verification. The tribunal found procedural irregularities where AO made additions without invoking specific legal provisions or informing the assessee under which section liability arose. CIT(A)&#039;s order was also dismissed for wrongly applying Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme provisions. The tribunal held that without specifying applicable legal provisions, additions cannot be sustained as it violates natural justice principles. The appeal was allowed and all additions deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>