<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1481 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458726</link>
    <description>An appeal against a revisionary order was not entertained because the delay remained unexplained and the affidavit did not provide a satisfactory basis for condonation. The assessee also failed to produce evidence supporting its claim that transport charges were paid without TDS deduction, despite repeated opportunities and earlier proceedings. The appeal was dismissed on both delay and merits-related non-production of evidence, leaving the Revenue&#039;s position undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 15:22:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1481 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458726</link>
      <description>An appeal against a revisionary order was not entertained because the delay remained unexplained and the affidavit did not provide a satisfactory basis for condonation. The assessee also failed to produce evidence supporting its claim that transport charges were paid without TDS deduction, despite repeated opportunities and earlier proceedings. The appeal was dismissed on both delay and merits-related non-production of evidence, leaving the Revenue&#039;s position undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>